Y Safle

In a recent news story, the Bishop of Southwark, Tom Butler, reported that he had been mugged on his way home from a drinks reception. However, later CCTV evidence came to light that suggested he had been drunk, and that he had broken into a vehicle on his way home.

Asked about this evidence, Tom Butler replied that he had amnesia and was undergoing extensive medical tests, but in his defence he said:

“Normally, at a reception, I will have a glass or two of wine. I’m very careful. “I don’t get drunk frequently. I would not be able to do my job if I got drunk. I certainly don’t think it’s a resigning matter.”

I think the key point is the line I don’t get drunk frequently.

From which we may adduce that the Bishop does get drunk, only infrequently.

And if he gets drunk, is it really “entirely out of character” as he had put it?

There is a debate amongst Christians about alcoholic beverages. Many Christians abstain entirely from such drinks on grounds that they are harmful to ourselves and society, and for some good biblical reasons.

Other Christians argue that Jesus drank wine, and the Bible never prohibits drinking - as long as it is in moderation.

But what we see here is an issue of a higher standard that ought to apply to our Christian leaders. If someone is given authority in the Church, the Paul is quite specific about the higher standards of conduct and propriety that relate to such a man and his family.

I would stop short of asking the Bishop of Southwark to resign - but he really needs to consider his attitude to alcohol in a culture that is destroying itself through over indulgence in this recreational drug. He may believe that alcohol is lawful to Christians, but in terms of his testimony it is really not hepful. Abstinence would be a better option.